Search for other papers by Rumiana Ganeva in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dimitar Parvanov in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Denitsa Velikova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Magdalena Vasileva in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kristina Nikolova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Georgi Stamenov in
Google Scholar
PubMed
obtained from 30 healthy donors’ germinal vesicles (GVs) after regular follicular puncture for egg donation. All included subjects signed written informed consent. Experimental design In this study, sperm morphology evaluation and SDF were compared
Search for other papers by Maria Handzhiyska in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rumiana Ganeva in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dimitar Parvanov in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Margarita Ruseva in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Petar Eftimov in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vilyana Georgieva in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Denitsa Velikova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Georgi Stamenov in
Google Scholar
PubMed
D – immotile. The percentage of progressively motile spermatozoa (grades A+B) was also evaluated. Evaluation of sperm morphology Sperm morphology in each sample was evaluated according to Kruger’s strict criteria ( Kruger et al. 1986
Search for other papers by B Ogunlade in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S C Gbotolorun in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by O A Adedotun in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by K Iteire in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J Adejayi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
compared to groups C, D, E, F, and G. Effect of VA and VC supplements on sperm morphology (neck, tail, and head defects and normal) on DEHP-induced normal and experimental rats The result revealed that rats treated with DEHP only (group B
Search for other papers by Shen Chuen Khaw in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zhen Zhe Wong in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Richard Anderson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sarah Martins da Silva in
Google Scholar
PubMed
⊕⊕⊝⊝ LOW a,c Normal sperm morphology 1.39–32.73% MD 2.41% higher 0.79 higher to 4.03 higher – 438 6 RCTs ⊕⊕⊝⊝ LOW a,c Clinical pregnancy Study population 113 per 1000 116 per 1000 61–221 1.03 (0
Search for other papers by Huidrom Yaiphaba Meitei in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Shubhashree Uppangala in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vani Lakshmi R in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Guruprasad Kalthur in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Satish Kumar Adiga in
Google Scholar
PubMed
were observed except for a moderate decline in sperm morphology ( P < 0.05) ( Table 1 ). The baseline semen characteristics in 20 (38%) subjects were below the WHO reference range; however, no significant decline in the ejaculate quality was observed
Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine, Lone Tree, Colorado, USA
Search for other papers by Jason R Herrick in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Cayla J Iske in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rachel M Santymire in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Colleen Lynch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mattina Alonge in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rebecca L Krisher in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
Search for other papers by Cheryl L Morris in
Google Scholar
PubMed
series, the volume of recovered sample was determined and small aliquots (~5 µL) were used to evaluate pH (pH Indicator Strip; Millipore Sigma), the proportion of motile sperm (0–100%), and sperm morphology (fixed in 0.4% glutaraldehyde) ( Howard 1993
Search for other papers by Lisa Windhofer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Auke Boersma in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maik Dahlhoff in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Thomas Rülicke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kerstin E Auer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
traits and the second analysis was performed after 2 h of incubation (T1) to assess the decline in sperm quality traits as an estimate for sperm longevity. Sperm morphology We further assessed sperm morphology to determine whether and how the
Search for other papers by Fabien Joao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Cyntia Duval in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), CHUM Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Search for other papers by Marie-Claire Bélanger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Julie Lamoureux in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Cheng Wei Xiao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Senem Ates in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Université Picardie Jules Verne, Médecine et Biologie de la Reproduction et Laboratoire PERITOX, CBH-CHU Amiens Picardie, Amiens, France
Search for other papers by Moncef Benkhalifa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pierre Miron in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Classical semen assessment consists of the analysis of standard descriptive sperm parameters such as concentration, motility and sperm morphology ( World Health Organization 2010 ). However, this analysis is limited and does not
Search for other papers by Alena J Hungerford in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Monash IVF Group, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Search for other papers by Hassan W Bakos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Robert J Aitken in
Google Scholar
PubMed
in a wide variety of ways, including reduced sperm number, lowered sperm motility, abnormal sperm morphology, impaired capacitation and sperm-egg recognition, lowered vitality, DNA damage, and oxidative stress ( Zini & Libman 2006 , Aitken & Roman
Search for other papers by Vanessa Caroline Fioravante in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alana Rezende Godoi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Victória Mokarzel de Barros Camargo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Patricia Fernanda Felipe Pinheiro in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marcelo Martinez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carlos Roberto Padovani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Francisco Eduardo Martinez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
dividing the number of sperm within each of these regions by the daily sperm production ( Robb et al. 1978 ). Paternal sperm morphology The sperm from C and H groups were obtained by a wash of vas deferens with a PBS solution. The volume of 10 µL