Search for other papers by Rumiana Ganeva in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dimitar Parvanov in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Denitsa Velikova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Magdalena Vasileva in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kristina Nikolova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Georgi Stamenov in
Google Scholar
PubMed
( Mackenna 1995 ). Currently, routine semen analysis, based on the evaluation of sperm count, sperm mobility, and morphology alone, provides valuable but superficial information about male fertility status. Despite being classified as normozoospermic, some
Search for other papers by Lisa Windhofer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Auke Boersma in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maik Dahlhoff in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Thomas Rülicke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kerstin E Auer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
method, which is the dissection of the caudaepididymidis, and compared sperm motility, swimming velocity and morphology traits between samples. Given that PESA samples have been successfully used for IVFs, we assume that PESA will provide sperm samples
Search for other papers by Maria Handzhiyska in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rumiana Ganeva in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dimitar Parvanov in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Margarita Ruseva in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Petar Eftimov in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vilyana Georgieva in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Denitsa Velikova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Georgi Stamenov in
Google Scholar
PubMed
application of this method selects spermatozoa with better motility ( AL-Marayaty et al. 2017 ), morphology ( Heidari et al. 2018 ), and lower sperm DNA fragmentation rates compared to native sperm ( Younglai et al. 2001 , Parmegiani et al. 2010
Search for other papers by Dimitra Apostolia Androni in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sophie Dodds in
Google Scholar
PubMed
School of Medicine, Division Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
Search for other papers by Mathew Tomlinson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Walid E Maalouf in
Google Scholar
PubMed
; Variation in methods used for the measurement of pre-freeze and post-thaw sperm parameters; Lack of consideration and assessment of sperm morphological defects possibly induced by sperm freezing. In view of the above, the aim of this study was
Search for other papers by Alena J Hungerford in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Monash IVF Group, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Search for other papers by Hassan W Bakos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Robert J Aitken in
Google Scholar
PubMed
in a wide variety of ways, including reduced sperm number, lowered sperm motility, abnormal sperm morphology, impaired capacitation and sperm-egg recognition, lowered vitality, DNA damage, and oxidative stress ( Zini & Libman 2006 , Aitken & Roman
Search for other papers by Shen Chuen Khaw in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zhen Zhe Wong in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Richard Anderson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sarah Martins da Silva in
Google Scholar
PubMed
⊕⊕⊝⊝ LOW a,c Normal sperm morphology 1.39–32.73% MD 2.41% higher 0.79 higher to 4.03 higher – 438 6 RCTs ⊕⊕⊝⊝ LOW a,c Clinical pregnancy Study population 113 per 1000 116 per 1000 61–221 1.03 (0
Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine, Lone Tree, Colorado, USA
Search for other papers by Jason R Herrick in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Cayla J Iske in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rachel M Santymire in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Colleen Lynch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mattina Alonge in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rebecca L Krisher in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
Search for other papers by Cheryl L Morris in
Google Scholar
PubMed
series, the volume of recovered sample was determined and small aliquots (~5 µL) were used to evaluate pH (pH Indicator Strip; Millipore Sigma), the proportion of motile sperm (0–100%), and sperm morphology (fixed in 0.4% glutaraldehyde) ( Howard 1993
Search for other papers by Clara Malo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sara Carracedo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maryse Delehedde in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University of Lille, CHRU, INSERM UMRS 1172, Lille, France
Search for other papers by Nicolas Sergeant in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Julian Alexandra Skidmore in
Google Scholar
PubMed
2008 ). Meanwhile, no seasonal differences were found in sperm morphology, findings similar to those of Swelum et al. (2018 b ) . However, conventional sperm parameters are held to be unsatisfactory because they do not not correlate well with
Search for other papers by Huidrom Yaiphaba Meitei in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Shubhashree Uppangala in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vani Lakshmi R in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Guruprasad Kalthur in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Satish Kumar Adiga in
Google Scholar
PubMed
motility, and morphological abnormalities were recorded. Sperm concentration was determined using a Makler counting chamber. Sperm motility was manually assessed in 200 spermatozoa on a slide using 40× objective under a compound microscope. Sperm vitality
Search for other papers by B Ogunlade in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S C Gbotolorun in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by O A Adedotun in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by K Iteire in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J Adejayi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
compared to groups C, D, E, F, and G. Effect of VA and VC supplements on sperm morphology (neck, tail, and head defects and normal) on DEHP-induced normal and experimental rats The result revealed that rats treated with DEHP only (group B
