Abstract
Yellowish myotis present a seasonal reproduction, influenced by rainfall distribution, in which the testis mass, germ cell composition, and brown adipose tissue (B.A.T.) mass change along the reproductive stages. In the present study, tissue xenografts were performed in immunodeficient mice to investigate spermatogenesis development in a stable endocrine milieu and the possible androgenic role of B.A.T. In this study, 41 adult male bats were captured in the Santuário do Caraça, Minas Gerais, Brazil. The gonads and B.A.T. were collected, weighed, and grafted under the mice's back skin. Mice biometric and hormonal data were evaluated after grafting, and the testis grafts and mice gonads were fixed for histological and immunohistochemical analyses. As a result, testis grafts from adult bats presented a continuous germ cell development in all reproductive stages, showing round spermatids in all testis tissues. Furthermore, testis fragments in the Rest stage presented elongating spermatids as the most advanced germ cell type in the seminiferous epithelium after 7 months of grafting. These data indicated that yellowish myotis spermatogenesis could be continued (presenting a constant spermatogonial differentiation) in a stable endocrine milieu, as found in mice. In addition, the best spermatogenic development was achieved when testis fragments were transplanted at their lowest activity (Rest stage). Regarding the B.A.T. grafts, the adipose tissue consumption by mice increased seminal vesicle mass and testosterone serum levels. This data proves that B.A.T. is related to testosterone synthesis, which may be critical in stimulating the differentiation of spermatogonia in yellowish myotis.
Lay summary
Bats are essential seed dispersers, pollinators, and agricultural pest regulators. Despite their ecological importance, bats face different threats due to environmental destruction and usually have few offspring per year. This study aimed to understand better how bats reproduce, but studying them in captivity is complicated and may not replicate what happens in the natural environment. To overcome this obstacle, we transplanted tissues from bats into mice which allowed in-depth research in lab conditions into bat reproduction. We looked at the tissues of adult bats after they had been transplanted into mice, and this allowed us to see which types of tissue played a critical role in reproduction.
Introduction
Bats present a high diversity with more than 1400 species worldwide (Wilson & Mittermeier 2019) and provide essential ecosystem services (Jones et al. 2009, Kunz et al. 2011, Maine & Boyles 2015, Puig-Montserrat et al. 2015, Russo & Jones 2015, Russo et al. 2018, Rodríguez-San Pedro et al. 2020). Bats adapt well to different reproductive strategies (Racey & Entwistle 2000) but present a low reproductive rate (Barclay et al. 2004, Jones et al. 2009). This feature makes them more vulnerable to different threats, such as urbanization, climate change (e.g. severe weather), changes in water quality, loss of roost sites, deforestation, hunting, diseases, and exposure to environmental contaminants (pesticides and heavy metals) (Jones et al. 2009, Zukal et al. 2015, Voigt & Kingston 2016, Frick et al. 2020).
Tissue xenograft, the biotechnology used in this study, has been used as a functional and powerful technique to investigate reproductive organ physiology in an ex situ manner (Paris et al. 2004, Rodriguez-Sosa & Dobrinski 2009, Santos et al. 2010, Arregui & Dobrinski 2014). This technique was studied in wild mammals aiming to preserve the genetic material of endangered mammal species (Honaramooz et al. 2004, Arregui et al. 2008a, Abbasi & Honaramooz 2011, 2012, Gourdon & Travis 2011, Arregui et al. 2014, Campos-Junior et al. 2014, Pothana et al. 2015). Testis xenograft was successful in some wild species, including seasonal species (Abbasi & Honaramooz 2012), generating valuable reproductive biology information, viable sperm and offspring (Honaramooz et al. 2004, Campos-Junior et al. 2014, Liu et al. 2016). Until now, there have been no studies using tissues from bats.
The Neotropical vespertilionid yellowish myotis bat (Myotis levis), the investigated species of this study, present a seasonal reproduction in which the development of spermatogenesis is linked to rainfall distribution (Farias et al. 2020). Our research group demonstrated that the testis parenchyma of yellowish myotis shows a remarkable variation in the germ cell population, allowing the identification of four reproductive stages known as Rest, Maturing, Mature, and Regressed (Farias et al. 2020). The Rest stage is characterized by the presence of the spermatogonial phase only. Primary spermatocytes are observed in the Maturing and Mature stages, coinciding with the peak of rainfall distribution. Sperm formation occurs in the Mature and Regressed stages only, during which the spermiogenic phase is observed. After the conclusion of spermiation, long-term sperm storage in epididymis cauda (~8 months) begins in the Regressed stage (Farias et al. 2020). An exciting aspect is related to the cyclic and synchronic fluctuation of the testis and epididymis mass along the reproductive stages. During the reproductive cycle, the maximum testis size and activity (Mature stage) is followed by the highest epididymis volume in the next reproductive phase (Regressed stage). Investigating the impacts of abiotic factors in testis physiology is needed to avoid valuable bat species loss. Testis tissue xenograft is a promising tool for scientific studies of seasonal species because the gonads are transferred to a more stable endocrine milieu.
Another interesting observation is that the brown adipose tissue (B.A.T.) mass varies in the same pattern as the accessory sex gland mass throughout the reproductive stages, indicating a possible role of this organ in the yellowish myotis male reproductive cycle (Farias et al. 2020). Furthermore, comparing the Rest stage to the Mature stage, the B.A.T. mass negatively correlates with serum testosterone levels (Farias et al. 2020). These findings suggest that the B.A.T. was possibly used for androgenic purposes in the yellowish myotis (Krutzsch & Wells 1960). Current data demonstrate that adipose tissue may contain the steroidogenic machinery necessary to initiate steroid biosynthesis de novo from cholesterol (Li et al. 2015). In this case, xenografting may offer a novel approach for evaluating the possible involvement of B.A.T. in steroidogenesis.
Therefore, the present study aimed to use testis tissue xenograft from adult yellowish myotis to investigate the resumption of spermatogenesis in tissue derived from different reproductive stages without the influence of environmental factors and to use the B.A.T. xenograft from adult yellowish myotis to evaluate its possible androgenic role in bats for the first time.
Materials and methods
Study area and capture of bats
The yellowish myotis colony lives in Santuário do Caraça, a preserved area in Serra do Caraça, southeastern Brazil (20°04’30’’S, 43°24’28’’W), which belongs to the Iron Quadrangle geomorphological domain (Moreira & Pereira 2004, Abreu & Palú 2008). The reserve has a great diversity of fauna and flora because it is located in a transition region of Atlantic Forest and Cerrado biomes (Giulietti et al. 1997, Moreira & Pereira 2004, Abreu & Palú 2008). A seasonal climate characterizes this region with a rainy summer (rainy season – October to March) and a dry winter (dry season – April to September), in which the precipitation occurs mainly during the rainy season (81.5% of the annual average of 1.373 mm) and the remaining percentage of precipitation occurs in the dry season (de Sá Júnior et al. 2012).
Bats were captured from August 2017 to November 2020 using mist-nets installed in the attic of Santuário do Caraça church, from 18:00 to 00:00 h. Forty-one male bats were collected representing the reproductive stages Rest, Maturing, Mature and Regressed (Farias et al. 2020) for xenograft experiments (Table 1). The forearm length, body mass, age class, and sex of each individual were recorded. Only adult males were used, differentiated from subadults by ossified finger epiphyseal cartilages in the metacarpus (Anthony 1988) and complete testicular descent (Duarte & Talamoni 2010). Bats were sacrificed through intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (240 mg/kg body weight) and xylazine (30 mg/kg body weight), and the gonads, epididymis, and B.A.T. from the interscapular region were collected.
Yellowish myotis sampling from August 2017 to November 2020.
Reproductive stages | Months | Number of animals | Analyses |
---|---|---|---|
Rest | May to June | 6 | Testis xenograft |
July to August | 6 | Testis xenograft | |
Maturing | November to December | 14 | Testis and brown adipose tissue xenograft |
January to February | 3 | Brown adipose tissue xenograft | |
Mature | March | 6 | Testis xenograft |
Regressed | April | 6 | Testis xenograft |
All specimens were deposited in the Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais reference collection. Captures were performed under license (#28120-4) granted by the Brazilian Chico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation, and access to animal genetic legacy was granted by license nº A8CA63C of the Genetic Legacy Management Council by the Brazilian Ministry of Environment (SISGen). The Ethics Committee on Animal Use from the Federal University of Minas Gerais (CEUA document 386/2017) approved the study procedures.
Testis and brown adipose tissue xenograft
The xenograft procedure was performed immediately after testis and B.A.T. harvesting. Each testis was sectioned into four fragments (3 × 3 × 5 mm), and half of the B.A.T. was used in each xenograft. After that, the tissues were maintained on Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (#12500-062; DMEM/F12, Gibco) at 35°C for 15 min and then the xenograft procedure was performed in the sexually mature immunodeficient recipient mice.
Testis fragments (from each reproductive stage) of yellowish myotis were grafted under the back skin of 15 castrated NSG mice (6 grafts per mouse, 90 grafts in total), resulting in 4 experimental groups (Rest = 6 mice and 36 grafts, Maturing = 3 mice and 18 grafts, Mature = 3 mice and 18 grafts, Regressed = 3 mice and 18 grafts). Mice were anesthetized through intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (240 mg/kg body weight) and xylazine (30 mg/kg body weight). Then, the animals were castrated and subsequently positioned in the ventral decubitus position, and three incisions of approximately 0.5 cm were performed bilaterally to the dorsal line. The skin was dissected, forming pockets in which the fragments were placed. After receiving the fragment, the incisions were sutured with 5.0 silk threads (Biosut, Brazil).
The B.A.T. of the Maturing stage (0.0499 ± 0.0043 g) (Farias et al. 2020) was grafted under the back skin of 8 non-castrated 8-week-old NUDE mice (2 random grafts per mouse, 16 grafts in total). The NUDE mice (without fur) were used to easily observe the B.A.T. mass reduction along the grafting time. The Maturing stage was chosen because it is the phase in which the B.A.T. is consumed by yellowish myotis. Additionally, five NUDE mice (16-week-old) were used as a control group. Anesthesia and surgery procedures were the same as above, but only one incision was performed bilaterally to the dorsal line. The animals were kept on a heated surface (37°C) during surgery to prevent hypothermia and facilitate recovery.
Biometric data and histological evaluation
The body and graft masses were evaluated at 5 and 2 months after grafting for testis and B.A.T., respectively. We waited for 5 months for testis xenografting based on previous reports (Arregui & Dobrinski 2014). B.A.T. xenografting was discontinued (after 2 months) due to the severe reduction of this tissue under the back skin of NUDE mice. The seminal vesicle mass was used to indicate bioactive testosterone for the testis tissue and B.A.T. xenograft experiments (Arregui et al. 2008a, 2014). The mice were sacrificed through intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (240 mg/kg body weight) and xylazine (30 mg/kg body weight) to recover the tissue xenografts.
The epididymis and one testis tissue fragment per bat were not used for grafting, allowing the observation of the original physiologic status of the organs. These organs and the B.A.T. were fixed in Bouin solution, routinely prepared, and embedded in Paraplast® for histological analysis (Fig. 1A). Moreover, these histological images were used as controls for animal age, demonstrating that they were adult animals (spermatozoa identification) (Fig. 1B to E).
After 5 months of grafting, the testis tissue fragments were fixed in Bouin solution and 4% glutaraldehyde for histological analysis. Each germ cell type (undifferentiated spermatogonia, differentiated spermatogonia, spermatocytes, and round spermatids) was counted in 20 seminiferous tubules per reproductive stage. This quantification was performed to determine the spermatogenesis progression after testis tissue xenograft. Concerning the B.A.T. experiments, the NUDE mice gonads were fixed in Bouin solution, routinely processed, and embedded in Paraplast® for histological analysis. As the best outcome was in the Rest stage after 5 months, we qualitatively analyzed the testis graft histologies in this reproductive stage after 7 months to determine if spermatogenesis would advance further than round spermatid steps.
Hormonal analyses
Blood samples of mice were collected by cardiac puncture after anesthesia induction. Plasma was separated through centrifugation (720 g , for 10 min, at 4°C) and stored at −20°C for subsequent hormone evaluation. The samples were analyzed in the automated Cobas e411 (Roche Diagnostics Inc.) platform to assess testosterone directly. Serum testosterone levels were measured using commercial kits (Roche Diagnostics Inc.) through the electrochemiluminescence method (sensitivity of 2.5 ng/dL). Testosterone intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CV) were 1.1 and 1.5%, respectively. The procedures were performed by a Licensed Laboratory specialist in Animal Health (TECSA(R) Laboratory, Belo Horizonte, Brazil).
Immunostaining analyses
For immunohistochemical analysis, deparaffinized sections were dehydrated, and the endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by incubating the sections in a 3% hydrogen peroxide solution (Sigma). After that, the antigens were exposed to heating in buffered sodium citrate (pH 6.0) at 96°C for 10 min, and the protein was blocked using 10% normal rabbit serum (Sigma #R9133) in PBS for 30 min. The slides were incubated overnight (4°C) with a specific primary antibody against the steroidogenic enzyme 3-Beta-HSD (1:100, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, goat polyclonal antibody, sc-30820). Considering that the antibody was raised against the human protein, the protein homology between human and Myotis species was tested through in silico analysis (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool), showing 76.7% homology. The reaction was developed using rabbit pAb to goat secondary IgG antibody (ab6740; Abcam Inc.). Diaminobenzidine (DAB) was used as chromogen, and the negative control had the primary antibody omitted. For the steroidogenic enzyme 3-Beta-HSD expression, protein labeling was quantified. In this analysis, three random images (30 cells) were captured from the testicular parenchyma of mice using an Olympus BX60 microscope with a coupled camera. The images were treated to convert into gray scale in Photoshop CS6 v13.0, and pixel intensity was measured from the labeled cells, normalized by the pixel intensity obtained from the image's background (lumen of seminiferous tubules or blood vessels).
Statistical analysis
All quantitative data were tested for normality and homoscedasticity of variances by the D'Agostino and Pearson tests. The data obtained were expressed as the mean ±s.e.m., and the statistical analyses were performed using the program GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, Inc). The level of significance considered was P <0.05.
For testis tissue xenograft, mice body mass, seminal vesicle mass, and serum testosterone levels presented a normal distribution. These parameters were submitted for one-way ANOVA , and the Newman–Keuls test compared the means of the reproductive stages. The testis tissue graft masses in the Mature and Maturing stages presented normal distribution and were submitted to Student's t-test. Testis tissue graft masses in Rest and Regressed stages presented a non-parametric distribution and were submitted to the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The percentages of seminiferous tubules with germ cells also showed a non-parametric distribution but were submitted to Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn's test to compare the means of the reproductive stages.
For B.A.T. xenograft, mice body mass, seminal vesicle mass, serum levels of testosterone, and 3-Beta-HSD pixel intensity presented normal distribution and were submitted to Student's t-test. The B.A.T. graft mass presented a non-parametric distribution and was submitted to the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test.
Results
Mice seminal vesicle mass and serum testosterone levels did not change among the groups of testis tissue xenograft
The body mass and seminal vesicle masses of mice that received testis tissue xenografts showed no significant differences among the reproductive stages (Fig. 2A and B, Table 2). The absolute values of serum testosterone levels increased from the Rest to the Mature stage and decreased in the Regressed stage. However, it is crucial to mention that no significant variation was observed among the reproductive stages (Fig. 2D, Table 2).
Mean (±s.e.m.) values of mouse and testis fragment parameters after grafting.
Parameters | Rest | Maturing | Mature | Regressed | ANOVA (F) | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BM (g) | 29.20 ± 1.02 | 32.00 ± 2.00 | 27.40 ± 2.40 | 29.33 ± 1.33 | 1.253 | 0.3473 |
SVM (g) | 0.4664 ± 0.0594 | 0.4807 ± 0.1247 | 0.4084 ± 0.0045 | 0.4427 ± 0.0916 | 0.1040 | 0.9556 |
TSL (ng/dL) | 97.13 ± 19.50 | 193.70 ± 92.03 | 307.00 ± 5.00 | 193.20 ± 56.13 | 1.725 | 0.2484 |
UND (%) | 95.00 ± 3.44a | 87.50 ± 6.15a | 45.00 ± 8.03b | 57.50 ± 8.33b | 27.97* | <0.0001 |
DIFF (%) | 97.50 ± 2.50a | 85.00 ± 6.40ab | 12.50 ± 7.14c | 52.50 ± 10.60b | 39.89* | <0.0001 |
Pl-Z (%) | 75.00 ± 7.70a | 70.00 ± 6.70a | 12.50 ± 6.15b | 25.00 ± 8.51b | 34.10* | <0.0001 |
P (%) | 85.00 ± 5.26a | 50.00 ± 8.11ab | 10.00 ± 5.85c | 37.50 ± 8.80bc | 34.12* | <0.0001 |
R (%) | 37.50 ± 7.14a | 5.00 ± 3.44b | 5.00 ± 5.00b | 7.50 ± 4.10b | 24.81* | <0.0001 |
Different line superscript letters show statistically significant differences, P <0.05. *Kruskal-Wallis test (H).
DIFF, differentiated spermatogonia; P, pachytene spermatocytes; Pl-Z, pre-leptotene to zygotene spermatocytes; R, round spermatids;SVM, seminal vesicle mass; TSL, testosterone serum levels; UND, undifferentiated spermatogonia.
Testis tissue fragments from the Rest stage presented the highest growth index
The testis fragments from the Rest stage demonstrated an expressive and significant volume increase after grafting (prior grafting = 0.0012 ± 0.0002 g and after grafting = 0.0088 ± 0.0013 g) (Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, KS = 0.9667, P = 0.0002) (Fig. 2C). Although in a lower index, the volume of testis fragments from the Maturing stage also significantly increased after grafting (prior grafting = 0.0028 ± 0.0003 g and after grafting = 0.0054 ± 0.0006 g) (t-test, t = 2.618, df = 22, P = 0.0157) (Fig. 2C). On the other hand, the testis fragments from the Mature stage presented a significant volume decrease (prior grafting = 0.0150 ± 0.0015 g and after grafting = 0.0091 ± 0.0014 g) (t-test, t = 2.549, df = 16, P = 0.0215) (Fig. 2C), and testis fragment size did not differ in the Regressed stage after grafting (prior grafting = 0.0064 ± 0.0007 g and after grafting =0.0161 ± 0.0089 g) (Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, KS = 0.2778, P = 0.8782) (Fig. 2C).
Xenografting in the Rest stage promoted the best development of the spermiogenic phase
The yellowish myotis testis parenchyma presented only Sertoli and undifferentiated spermatogonial cells in the Rest stage (in situ) (Fig. 3A). Surprisingly, the testis fragments (xenografting) in this phase resulted in an expressive development of the seminiferous epithelium, displaying germ cells from the three phases of spermatogenesis after 5 (Fig. 3A' and A", 4A) and 7 (Fig. 5) months of grafting.
Undifferentiated and differentiated spermatogonial cells were evident (>95%) in the basal compartment (Fig. 3A" and 4A) of the seminiferous tubule cross-sections (Fig. 4E and F, Table 2). Primary spermatocytes in pre-leptotene, zygotene, and pachytene cells were readily observed (Fig. 3A" and 4A) in 75–85% of the seminiferous tubule cross-sections (Fig. 4C and D, Table 2).
Regarding the third phase of spermatogenesis, round spermatids were the most advanced germ cell type identified (Fig. 3A" and 4A), showing the highest percentage among the reproductive stages (Fig. 4B, Table 2). Interestingly, testis fragments from the Rest stage presented round spermatids (Fig. 5B and D) and elongating spermatids in the seminiferous epithelium (Fig. 5F) after 7 months of grafting.
Spermatogenesis progressed well until the meiotic phase after xenografting in the Maturing stage
The differentiation of spermatogonia into primary spermatocytes characterizes the yellowish myotis Maturing stage (in situ) (Fig. 3B). Similarly, the testis grafts presented differentiated spermatogonial cells and primary spermatocytes (Fig. 3B' and B", 4A) in the majority of the seminiferous tubule cross-sections (85% and 50–70%, respectively) (Fig. 4C to F, Table 2). Although in a lower frequency, it should be mentioned that round spermatids were observed in the seminiferous epithelium (Fig. 3B", 4A and B, Table 2).
Reduced spermatogenic activity was observed in testis fragments xenografted in the Mature stage
In the yellowish myotis Mature stage (in situ), a natural gap was observed between undifferentiated spermatogonial cells and primary spermatocytes. Furthermore, more advanced germ cells, including round and elongated spermatids, were identified in this phase (Fig. 3C).
After grafting in this phase, a small percentage of seminiferous tubule cross-sections showed germ cells beyond the undifferentiated spermatogonial cells (Fig. 4A to F, Table 2). Differentiated spermatogonia, spermatocytes, and round spermatids were also identified in a reduced number (Fig. 3C' and C", 4A to E, Table 2).
Reduced activity of meiotic and spermiogenic phases was observed after xenografting in the Regressed stage
In the Regressed stage (in situ), the yellowish myotis testis presents unique characteristics, such as seminiferous tubules with a wide lumen and a vast gap between undifferentiated spermatogonial cells elongated spermatids (Fig. 3D). After grafting, approximately half of the seminiferous tubule cross-sections (>52.5%) displayed undifferentiated and differentiated spermatogonia (Fig. 4E and F). Although in a lower frequency, primary spermatocytes (pre-leptotene, leptotene, zygotene, and pachytene cells) and round spermatids (Fig. 3D", 4A-D, and Table 2) were also observed.
Mast cells were frequently observed in the most advanced testis tissue fragments
Although the germ cell composition was quite different among the reproductive phases, all testis xenografts led to the formation of round spermatids after 5 months of grafting (Fig. 3 and 4). Interestingly, mast cells were frequently observed in the xenograft interstitial compartment, especially in those fragments that presented the highest development (Rest and Maturing stages) (Fig. 3A'' and B''). Several histopathological alterations were observed in the xenografts of the Maturing, Mature, and Regressed stages (Fig. 3B', C' and D').
The brown adipose tissue graft mass decreased promoting androgenic stimuli
After 2 months of grafting, no significant variation was observed in mice's weight (Table 3). The seminal vesicle mass presented a significant increase (Fig. 6A, Table 3). In an opposite pattern, the B.A.T. graft mass decreased significantly (Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, KS = 0.6875, P = 0.0010) (Fig. 6B). Moreover, testosterone serum levels increased more than six-fold in the grafted mice (Fig. 6C, Table 3). The different 3-Beta-HSD immunolabeling patterns in Leydig cell cytoplasm from control mice (Fig. 6E) and grafted mice (Fig. 6F) and the significant increased 3-Beta-HSD pixel intensity evaluation (Fig. 6D) indicated that the B.A.T. consumption is stimulating these cells.
Mean (±s.e.m.) values (in g, except for TSL: ng/Dl, and PI) of body mass (BM), seminal vesicle mass (SVM), testosterone serum levels (TSL), and 3-Beta-HSD pixel intensity (PI) of control mice and mice that received brown adipose tissue (B.A.T.) xenografts of yellowish myotis.
Experimental groups | BM | SVM | TSL | PI |
---|---|---|---|---|
Control | 25.10 ± 1.57 | 0.1617 ± 0.0326a | 283.6 ± 101.9a | 115.3 ± 3.8a |
B.A.T. grafts | 24.05 ± 1.69 | 0.3158 ± 0.0425b | 1857.0 ± 274.9b | 130.2 ± 4.3b |
Student’s t-test | 0.4237 | 2.564 | 4.343 | 2.523 |
P value | 0.6800 | 0.0263 | 0.0012 | 0.0326 |
Different column superscript letters show statistically significant differences, P < 0.05.
Discussion
Yellowish myotis presents a seasonal reproduction linked to rainfall distribution (Farias et al. 2020). To evaluate the gonad and B.A.T. physiology in a stable endocrine milieu, we opted to graft the organs in immunodeficient mice. The recipient mice allowed a constant testosterone production and promoted continuous spermatogenesis in testis tissues of all reproductive stages of this seasonal species. Furthermore, we demonstrated that adult testis tissue xenografts could be well-succeed when testis fragments in low spermatogenic activity are transplanted. For the first time, we also showed that the B.A.T. plays a pivotal androgenic function, as it stimulates the testosterone synthesis of mice (Fig. 7). This data indicated that the cyclic fluctuation of the B.A.T. weight observed in yellowish myotis directly links with the serum testosterone levels oscillation. We suggest that the B.A.T. may stimulate the bat gonad steroidogenic activity, inducing spermatogonia differentiation and spermatogenesis progression (Fig. 8).
In our study, testis tissue xenografts of an adult bat were performed for the first time. The testosterone serum levels of grafted mice did not show significant differences among the reproductive stages, suggesting that a stable LH stimulus in mice regulated the hormonal synthesis. The germ cells progressed until the round spermatid step in testis grafts of all reproductive stages after 5 months of grafting. Furthermore, elongating spermatids were observed in testis fragments of the Rest stage after 7 months of grafting. This finding indicates that testosterone would be vital in promoting undifferentiated spermatogonial differentiation since we do not observe this differentiation in the Rest and Regressed stage of yellowish myotis (Fig. 8A). Testosterone is believed to stimulate spermatogonial differentiation in other wild mammalian species (collared peccary) (Campos-Junior et al. 2012). Interestingly, the Rest stage fragments were more successful considering the spermatogenic progression, probably due to a low state of spermatogenesis (Arregui et al. 2008b).
In normal conditions (bat reproduction physiology), testis at the Mature and Regressed stage would reach the Rest stage 5 months later. In the Rest stage, the animals present only spermatogonia in the seminiferous epithelium (Farias et al. 2020). However, we observed round spermatids when we transplanted testis tissues from the Mature and Regressed stages into mice. The Regressed stage (containing only spermatids in the epithelium) can be expected 5 months after the Maturing stage in nature (Farias et al. 2020). However, we found spermatocytes in the seminiferous epithelium of the grafts, indicating continued spermatogenesis. For the Rest stage, we would expect the Maturing stage in natural conditions 5 months after our tissue harvesting time. In the Maturing stage, the animals do not present round spermatids (Farias et al. 2020), which is different from the data after the xenograft. All these findings indicate that the steady endocrine environment was more supportive for spermatogenesis development.
The success of testis xenografts is highly variable in adult wild mammal species (Table 4). Using a seasonal and adult animal (Djungarian hamster), Schlatt and colleagues showed that most testis tissues degenerated after grafting (Schlatt et al. 2002); however, spermatocytes were found in photoregressed testis tissues 7 weeks post-grafting (Schlatt et al. 2002). Unlike the good results achieved in yellowish myotis, testis grafts from adult Lynx (Lynx pardinus) and older monkeys (Macaca mulatta; 11–12 years old) degenerated after grafting (Arregui et al. 2008b, 2014). Grafts from subadult monkeys (6 years old) presented a discrete advance of spermatogenesis, and spermatocytes were observed in 0.3% of the seminiferous tubules cross-sections (Arregui et al. 2008b). Grafts from younger subadult monkeys (3 years old) showed higher percentages of seminiferous tubules with spermatocytes (64.1%) after 24 weeks of transplantation. However, it should be mentioned that elongated spermatids were identified in a few seminiferous tubules cross-sections (1.1%) (Arregui et al. 2008b).
Morphological aspects of testis tissue xenografting in mature wild mammal species.
Xenograft development | Species and age | Reference |
---|---|---|
Degeneration | Iberian lynx (2 years old), Rhesus monkey (11 and 12 years old) | Arregui et al. 2008b, 2014 |
Sertoli cell only | Rhesus monkey (11 and 12 years old) | Arregui et al. 2008b |
Spermatocytes | Djungarian hamster, Rhesus monkey (6 years old) | Schlatt et al. 2002, Arregui et al. 2008b |
Round spermatids | Yellowish myotis | Present study |
Elongated spermatids | Rhesus monkey (3 years old) | Arregui et al. 2008b |
The testis tissue xenografts from immature donors usually show a better development than tissue grafts from sexually mature donors (Arregui et al. 2008b, Arregui & Dobrinski 2014). Several factors could favor juvenile graft development, such as a lower metabolism of spermatogenesis, higher resistance to ischemic conditions, and intense somatic cell proliferation (Schlatt et al. 2002, Arregui et al. 2008b, Arregui & Dobrinski 2014). As previously mentioned, most grafted tissues from adult donors usually degenerate (Schlatt et al. 2002, Arregui et al. 2008b, 2014). The first report of complete spermatogenesis resulting in viable and functional sperm occurred in testis tissue xenografts from immature mice, pigs, and goats (Honaramooz et al. 2002). This technique was successfully applied to juvenile wild animals, such as bison calves, white-tailed deer, collared peccary, ferret, Djungarian hamster, and rhesus monkey, resulting in sperm production (Schlatt et al. 2002, Honaramooz et al. 2004, Abbasi & Honaramooz 2011, 2012, Gourdon & Travis 2011, Campos-Junior et al. 2014). In the endangered immature Cuvier's gazelle (Arregui et al. 2014), a similar spermatocyte percentage was found in testis parenchyma compared to yellowish myotis grafting (Rest stage). Interestingly, the spermatogenic development in testis grafts from adult yellowish myotis was better than the testis xenografting of bison, white-tailed deer, banteng, and Iberian lynx (Honaramooz et al. 2005, Abbasi & Honaramooz 2011, 2012, Arregui et al. 2014).
The B.A.T. of yellowish myotis showed a weight fluctuation along the reproductive stages (Farias et al. 2020). The consumption of the B.A.T. by yellowish myotis coincided with the better progression of spermatogenesis and production of testosterone. It is thought that testosterone allows the differentiation of undifferentiated spermatogonia (Farias et al. 2020). The androgenic activity of B.A.T. was previously explored in hibernating bat Myotis lucifugus (Krutzsch & Wells 1960). In this study, non-castrated rats were treated with a fraction (nonsaponifiable) of the interscapular B.A.T. of M. lucifugus. This treatment promoted evident seminal vesicle hypertrophy. Furthermore, the authors suggested that 1 g of this fraction corresponded to 676 µg of testosterone, indicating a high androgenic activity of the B.A.T. (Krutzsch & Wells 1960).
To observe if the yellowish myotis B.A.T. influenced testosterone production, we performed a xenograft with this tissue for the first time. The recipient mice consumed the B.A.T. during the 2 months of grafting. Consequently, there was an increase in the mice's seminal vesicle weight (two times higher) and serum testosterone levels (six times higher). These data confirmed the androgenic role of the yellowish myotis B.A.T.. Furthermore, yellowish myotis' consumption of B.A.T. coincided with the spermatogonia differentiation, suggesting that this organ may be linked to germ cell development (Fig. 8). Future molecular studies must investigate if the Regressed and Rest stages promote undifferentiated spermatogonia expansion before the serum testosterone peak.
According to the 3-Beta-HSD immunostaining and pixel intensity, the B.A.T., directly or indirectly, stimulated the Leydig cell steroidogenic activity. The more robust 3-Beta-HSD immunolabeling pattern was previously demonstrated in yellowish myotis (in situ) during B.A.T. consumption (Farias et al. 2020). While B.A.T. contributes to heat production during the arousal from hibernation in temperate-zone bats (Smalley & Dryer 1963, Hayward & Ball 1966, Lyman 1970), it is linked to reproduction in Neotropical yellowish myotis, possessing an essential androgenic function. In future studies, we need to investigate the molecular via related to the B.A.T. products to elucidate if they stimulate the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis (indirect action) or testis parenchyma (direct action).
In conclusion, we observed that the low metabolic status of the testis fragment (Rest stage) is more significant for the success of testis tissue xenografts than the animal's age. Furthermore, the stable endocrine milieu of mice is sufficient for the androgenic support and to generate elongating spermatids of yellowish myotis 7 months after grafting. After the B.A.T. transplantation, we observed a powerful stimulus in the mice's testosterone production. This finding confirmed what was previously speculated for yellowish myotis reproductive physiology, i.e. in the Mature stage of this species, the B.A.T. reaches the smallest size along with the highest serum testosterone levels (Farias et al. 2020). These data reinforce that the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonad axis and the B.A.T. precisely regulate the gonad function in yellowish myotis. In general, we can say that the xenograft experiments can elucidate the physiology of wild animals, especially those that are challenging to maintain in captivity.
Declaration of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.
Funding
This work was supported by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), and the Foundation to Support Research of the State of Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG -APQ-01078-21).
Author contribution statement
T.O.F., S.A.T, and G.M.J.C. planned the experiments. T.O.F and G.M.J.C captured the animals, performed the experiments, and wrote the paper. A.F.A.F and N.T.W did the mouse IHC analyzes. A.F.A.F, S.A.T., and N.T.W. did a critical revision of the manuscript. T.O.F. and G.M.J.C. approved the final version of the paper.
Acknowledgements
The support from Image Acquisition and Processing Center (CAPI- ICB/UFMG) were of great importance. The authors thank the Brazilian Chico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (ICMBIO) for providing the licence to capture the animals and the staff of the Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural Santuário do Caraça for allowing us to collect the bats. The authors also thank Mara Lívia dos Santos, Fr. Lauro Palú, and Dr Aline Abreu for their scientific, technical, and logistical assistance.
References
Abbasi S & Honaramooz A 2011 Xenografting of testis tissue from bison calf donors into recipient mice as a strategy for salvaging genetic material. Theriogenology 76 607–614. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.03.011)
Abbasi S & Honaramooz A 2012 Feasibility of salvaging genetic potential of post-mortem fawns: production of sperm in testis tissue xenografts from immature donor white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in recipient mice. Animal Reproduction Science 135 47–52. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.09.007)
Abreu ACL & Palú L 2008 RPPN santuário do Caraça. In RPPN: Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural em destaque na conservação da biodiversidade da Mata Atlântica. Ed. Vieira MCW São Paulo: Conselho Nacional da Reserva da Biosfera da Mata Atlântica, pp. 60–63.
Anthony ELP 1988 Age determination in bats. In Ecological and Behavioral Methods for the Study of Bats. Ed. Kunz TH Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 47–57.
Arregui L & Dobrinski I 2014 Xenografting of testicular tissue pieces: 12 years of an in vivo spermatogenesis system. Reproduction 148 R71–R84. (https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-14-0249)
Arregui L, Dobrinski I & Roldan ER 2014 Germ cell survival and differentiation after xenotransplantation of testis tissue from three endangered species: Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus), Cuvier’s gazelle (Gazella cuvieri) and Mohor gazelle (G. dama mhorr). Reproduction, Fertility, and Development 26 817–826. (https://doi.org/10.1071/RD12411)
Arregui L, Rathi R, Megee SO, Honaramooz A, Gomendio M, Roldan ER & Dobrinski I 2008a Xenografting of sheep testis tissue and isolated cells as a model for preservation of genetic material from endangered ungulates. Reproduction 136 85–93. (https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-07-0433)
Arregui L, Rathi R, Zeng W, Honaramooz A, Gomendio M, Roldan ER & Dobrinski I 2008b Xenografting of adult mammalian testis tissue. Animal Reproduction Science 106 65–76. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.03.026)
Barclay RMR, Ulmer J, MacKenzie CJA, Thompson MS, Olson L, McCool J, Cropley E & Poll G 2004 Variation in the reproductive rate of bats. Canadian Journal of Zoology 82 688–693. (https://doi.org/10.1139/z04-057)
Moreira AMMA & Pereira CCA 2004 Levantamento Topoclimático da RPPN Santuário do Caraça. Caderno de Geografia 23 43–50.
Campos-Junior PH, Costa GM, Avelar GF, Lacerda SM, da Costa NN, Ohashi OM, Miranda Mdos S, Barcelos LS, Jorge EC & Guimarães DA et al.2014 Derivation of sperm from xenografted testis cells and tissues of the peccary (Tayassu tajacu). Reproduction 147 291–299. (https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-13-0581)
Campos-Junior PH, Costa GM, Lacerda SM, Rezende-Neto JV, de Paula AM, Hofmann MC & de França LR 2012 The spermatogonial stem cell niche in the collared peccary (Tayassu tajacu). Biology of Reproduction 86 1–10. (https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.111.095430)
de Sá Júnior A, de Carvalho LG, da Silva FF & de Carvalho Alves M 2012 Application of the Köppen classification of climatic zoning in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 108 1–7. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-011-0507-8)
Duarte APG & Talamoni SA 2010 Reproduction of the large fruit-eating bat Artibeus lituratus (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) in a Brazilian Atlantic forest area. Mammalian Biology 75 320–325. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2009.04.004)
Farias TO, Figueiredo AFA, Wnuk NT, Ferraz FS, Talamoni SA & Costa GMJ 2020 Male reproductive morphofunctional evaluation of a Neotropical sperm-storing vespertilionid bat (Myotis levis) in an environmental context. Cell and Tissue Research 382 639–656. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-020-03242-5)
Frick WF, Kingston T & Flanders J 2020 A review of the major threats and challenges to global bat conservation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1469 5–25. (https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14045)
Giulietti AM, Pirani JR & Harley RM 1997 Espinhaço range region, Eastern Brazil. In Centres of Plant Diversity, a Guide and Strategy for Their Conservation. Eds. Davis SD, Heywood VH, O, Herrera-Macbryde, Villa-Lobos J, Hamilton AC: Oxford: Information Press, pp. 397–404.
Gourdon JC & Travis AJ 2011 Spermatogenesis in ferret testis xenografts: a new model. Comparative Medicine 61 145–149.
Hayward JS & Ball EG 1966 Quantitative aspects of brown adipose tissue thermogenesis during arousal from hibernation. Biological Bulletin 131 94–103. (https://doi.org/10.2307/1539650)
Honaramooz A, Li MW, Penedo MCT, Meyers S & Dobrinski I 2004 Accelerated maturation of primate testis by xenografting into mice. Biology of Reproduction 70 1500–1503. (https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.025536)
Honaramooz A, Snedaker A, Boiani M, Schöler H, Dobrinski I & Schlatt S 2002 Sperm from neonatal mammalian testes grafted in mice. Nature 418 778–781. (https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00918)
Honaramooz A, Zeng W, Rathi R, Koster J, Ryder O & Dobrinski I 2005 Testis tissue xenografting to preserve germ cells from a cloned banteng calf. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 17 247–247. (https://doi.org/10.1071/RDv17n2Ab193)
Jones G, Jacobs DS, Kunz TH, Wilig MR & Racey PA 2009 Carpe noctem: the importance of bats as bioindicators. Endangered Species Research 8 93–115. (https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00182)
Krutzsch PH & Wells WW 1960 Androgenic activity in the interscapular brown adipose tissue of the male hibernating bat (Myotis lucifugus). Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 105 578–581. (https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-105-26182)
Kunz TH, De Torrez EB, Bauer D, Lobova T & Fleming TH 2011 Ecosystem services provided by bats. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1223 1–38. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06004.x)
Li J, Papadopoulos V & Vihma V 2015 Steroid biosynthesis in adipose tissue. Steroids 103 89–104. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2015.03.016)
Liu Z, Nie YH, Zhang CC, Cai YJ, Wang Y, Lu HP, Li YZ, Cheng C, Qiu ZL & Sun Q 2016 Generation of macaques with sperm derived from juvenile monkey testicular xenografts. Cell Research 26 139–142. (https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2015.112)
Lyman CP 1970 Thermoregulation and metabolism in bats. In Biology of Bats. Ed. WA, Wimsatt: San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 301–330.
Maine JJ & Boyles JG 2015 Bats initiate vital agroecological interactions in corn. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112 12438–12443. (https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1505413112)
Paris MC, Snow M, Cox SL & Shaw JM 2004 Xenotransplantation: a tool for reproductive biology and animal conservation? Theriogenology 61 277–291. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(0300234-6)
Pothana L, Makala H, Devi L, Varma VP & Goel S 2015 Germ cell differentiation in cryopreserved, immature, Indian spotted mouse deer (Moschiola indica) testes xenografted onto mice. Theriogenology 83 625–633. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.10.028)
Puig-Montserrat X, Torre I, López-Baucells A, Guerrieri E, Monti MM, Ràfols-García R, Ferrer X, Gisbert D & Flaquer C 2015 Pest control service provided by bats in Mediterranean rice paddies: linking agroecosystems structure to ecological functions. Mammalian Biology 80 237–245. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2015.03.008)
Racey PA & Entwistle AC 2000 Life-history and reproductive strategies of bats. In Reproductive Biology of Bats. Eds. Crichton EG, PH, Krutzsch: San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 363–414.
Rodríguez-San Pedro A, Allendes JL, Beltrán CA, Chaperon PN, Saldarriaga-Córdoba MM, Silva AX & Grez AA 2020 Quantifying ecological and economic value of pest control services provided by bats in a vineyard landscape of central Chile. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 302 107063. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.107063)
Rodriguez-Sosa JR & Dobrinski I 2009 Recent developments in testis tissue xenografting. Reproduction 138 187–194. (https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-09-0012)
Russo D, Bosso L & Ancillotto L 2018 Novel perspectives on bat insectivory highlight the value of this ecosystem service in farmland: research frontiers and management implications. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 266 31–38. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.07.024)
Russo D & Jones G 2015 Bats as bioindicators: an introduction. Mammalian Biology 80 157–158. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2015.03.005)
Santos RR, Amorim C, Cecconi S, Fassbender M, Imhof M, Lornage J, Paris M, Schoenfeldt V & Martinez-Madrid B 2010 Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue: an emerging technology for female germline preservation of endangered species and breeds. Animal Reproduction Science 122 151–163. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.08.010)
Schlatt S, Kim SS & Gosden R 2002 Spermatogenesis and steroidogenesis in mouse, hamster and monkey testicular tissue after cryopreservation and heterotopic grafting to castrated hosts. Reproduction 124 339–346. (https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.0.1240339)
Smalley RL & Dryer RL 1963 Brown fat: thermogenic effect during arousal from hibernation in the bat. Science 140 1333–1334. (https://doi.org/10.1126/science.140.3573.1333)
Voigt CC & Kingston T 2016 Bats in the Anthropocene: Conservation of Bats in a Changing World: Open: Springer.
Wilson DE & Mittermeier RA 2019 Handbook of the Mammals of the World 9: Bats , Barcelona: Lynx Editions.
Zukal J, Pikula J & Bandouchova H 2015 Bats as bioindicators of heavy metal pollution: history and prospect. Mammalian Biology 80 220–227. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2015.01.001)