The effect of embryo catheter loading technique on pregnancy rate

in Reproduction and Fertility
View More View Less
  • 1 T Matitashvili, Norfolk , 23503, United States
  • | 2 S Sadek, Norfolk , United States
  • | 3 G Celia, REI, Dominion Fertility, Arlington, United States

Correspondence: Tamar Matitashvili, Email: tam.matitashvili@gmail.com

Purpose: Embryo transfer is the last and most vital part of the in vitro fertilization treatment process. In recent years embryo transfer protocols have been standardized, but embryo-loading technique did not receive much attention per se. The aim of our study was to compare clinical pregnancy and positive pregnancy test rates between the two different embryo-loading (EL) techniques.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Methods: 493 frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles were included in our retrospective cohort study. From November 2018 until January 2020 “double air bubble” embryo catheter-loading technique was used. Starting from January 2020 until July 2021 lab introduced “medium only” loading-technique. In group A (n=249) loading was done by filling the catheter with 15-20μL of medium and then aspirating 10μL of air followed by 5-10μL of medium containing embryo(s). Adding 10μL of air at the tip of the catheter completed loading. In Group B (n=244) loading was performed by filling the catheter with 15-20μL of medium followed by an additional 5-10μL containing the embryo(s) with no air was aspirated.

Results: No statistical difference was detected between the groups with regard to age, body mass index (BMI), diagnosis, FET cycle characteristics, and quality of embryos transferred (all P>0.05). 493 FETs resulted in 279 positive pregnancy tests and 236 clinical pregnancies. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in clinical pregnancy (47% vs 48.7% P=0.36) and positive pregnancy test rate (55.8% vs 57.3% P= 0.40).

Conclusion: Embryo loading technique did not affect positive pregnancy test or clinical pregnancy rates.

 

     An official journal of

    Society for Reproduction and Fertility

 

Sept 2018 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 40 40 40
PDF Downloads 43 43 43