A New Decision-Support Tool in a Multi-Center Randomized Trial for Personalized, Optimized, and Simplified Fertility Treatment in non-PCOS Patients.
in Reproduction and FertilitySearch for other papers by Urmila Diwekar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Shyam Gupta in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anjali Gahlan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sumitra Hota in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kshitiz Murdia in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nitiz Murdia in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vipin Chandra in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nihar Bhoi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sanjay Joag in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
RESEARCH QUESTION: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a clinical decision support tool, Opt-IVF, in achieving the following outcomes: reducing the total cumulative dosage of Gonadotropins (Gn) used during controlled ovarian stimulation cycles and reducing the repeated ultrasonogram (USG) monitoring for follicular growth monitoring without compromising the number of good quality blastocysts obtained.
DESIGN: The study design employed a Multi-center Randomized Trial. The study enrolled 115 women aged 25–45 years undergoing IVF. Among the participants, 55 were randomly assigned to the intervention group (Opt-IVF), and 60 were randomly assigned to the control group. The intervention involved using a clinical decision support tool, Opt-IVF, to guide Gonadotropin dosing and trigger dates for a personalized controlled ovarian stimulation cycle.
RESULTS: The participants in the intervention group required significantly lower cumulative gonadotropin dosage during their controlled ovarian stimulation cycles. The intervention group had higher numbers of oocytes retrieved and M2 oocytes retrieved than the control group. The number of good quality blastocysts, the good blastocyst rate, the ovarian sensitivity index (OSI), and the pregnancy rate in the intervention group were significantly higher than in the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of the clinical decision support tool led to several positive outcomes, including eliminating the need for ultrasound exams after day 5, reducing the dosage of gonadotropin required, and yielding significantly higher numbers of high-quality blastocysts and higher pregnancy rates. Thus, Opt-IVF can successfully provide a personalized, optimized, and simplified approach to superovulation. Opt-IVF consistently outperformed the clinical teams in all outcomes.
Reproduction and Fertility is committed to supporting researchers in demonstrating the impact of their articles published in the journal.
As an open-access journal, Reproduction and Fertility articles are immediately available to read on publication, without restriction. The two types of article metrics we measure are (i) more traditional full-text views and pdf downloads, and (ii) Altmetric data, which shows the wider impact of articles in a range of non-traditional sources, such as social media.
More information is on the Reasons to publish page.
| Sept 2018 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full Text Views | 213 | 213 | 171 |
| PDF Downloads | 179 | 179 | 149 |
Online ISSN: 2633-8386
Strengthening biomedical communities
to advance science and health
CONTACT US
Bioscientifica Ltd | Starling House | 1600 Bristol Parkway North | Bristol BS34 8YU | UK
Bioscientifica Ltd | Registered in England no 3190519